Climate change denier redefines the number 10
June 9, 2009 in energy, Internet, mastur/metablogging
A magic moment in the history of troll; it may never come again.
OK, so you know the climate-change denier talking point about global warming supposedly “stopping” in the last ten years. It’s a classic example of how to lie with numbers; you just choose the bit of the data series that suits you and forget the rest. 1998 was really hot, so you start the chart there, and presto, a flat or declining trend. Learn about it here. Of course, the facts that it was rising steadily before ’98 and has been rising steadily since then, and that the best evidence that something isn’t rising is not that there has been an all-time high value recently are ignored.
Now, well, 1998 isn’t ten years ago any more. So, I was wondering if any of the trolls would be sighted claiming that global warming has stopped in the last ten years, now their own talking point doesn’t make sense even on its own terms. Enter David “no-one could be better named” Duff with a genuinely duff performance.
Incidentally, ‘Little Willy’, what’s happened to all that global warming in the last 10 years? No, on second thoughts don’t bother replying to that, your written equivalent of the clicks and grunts of a Kalahari bushman is simply too, too, tedious.
Oh, mate, that’s your Prime Directive (“Don’t be such an arse about it”) violated right there, with a good dollop of racism chucked in.
But for our purposes, look at the chart here; if you start measuring 10 years ago from today, in 1999, you get a warming trend of almost 0.4 degrees C, about four times greater than the linear regression would give you! DOOOMED I tell you!
Quite an achievement; you’d think that repeating talking points was within anyone’s abilities, but we’ve found a troll who can even bollocks that up. FAIL.
-
1
target for tonight… « Alternate Seat of TYR
Pingback on Jun 10th, 2009 at 11:04 pm
[…] 10, 2009 in energy, fisking OK, time to make the rubble bounce. There’s a nice online visualiser for climate data here, […]
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Recent Comments
raw_input
-
4GW action Afghanistan aviation conservatives corruption cultures of war economics geekage GSM hacker history Home Office ideology intelligence and stupidity Internet Iran Iraq mastur/metablogging moral horror networks politics press socialism special relationships strategy surveillance Tories Uncategorized Viktor
World of Harrowell
Categories
Archives
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
BORISFEED
- An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
June 9, 2009 at 6:42 pm
Oo, I love spotting that kind of fakery – I once saw a classic example which showed that rail privatisation was a really good deal for taxpayers by taking the mid-90s-recession rail subsidy level* compared to the point where Railtrack wasn’t investing in infrastructure (i.e. just before it collapsed and the state had to assume massive liabilities) to prove that nationalisation is a money pit.
* For extra goodness, I think this was the bit where they stuffed extra subsidy in to make it more attractive to buyers…
June 10, 2009 at 2:42 pm
It’s his hardcore “never apologise, never admit you’re wrong, NO MATTER WHAT” attitude that dumbfounds me.
Does a man *learn* those skills? Or are they simply a function of deep-seated stupidity?
June 10, 2009 at 5:15 pm
What’s the chart you’re linking to? I don’t see a 10-year one at that link. You might consider using woodfortrees to make a custom chart for 10 years, like this one: http://woodfortrees.org/plot/wti/from:1999/plot/wti/from:1999/trend
June 10, 2009 at 8:29 pm
Ooh, shiny! However I’m both lazy, and also concerned by the cogsci research that suggests that we are all influenced by bad data even if we know it’s bad.
June 11, 2009 at 12:08 am
What’s extra fun is when you plot 1998-2008, the holy grail decade for denial…
http://woodfortrees.org/plot/wti/from:1998/to:2008/plot/wti/from:1998/to:2008/trend
Ah, the decade of the downward trend… as long as down means up.
June 10, 2009 at 9:59 pm
In the discussion David Duff refers to his blog to show how Hansen’s projections failed. Turns out he compares Hansen’s annual data to RSS MSU monthly without correcting the anomalies for the difference in the base period of the anomalies. A rough approximation for the necessary correction is to push up RSS MSU by about 0.25°C, eyeballed from this graph.