The IPCC Report
November 8, 2007 in Home Office, Internet, Met, moral horror, terrorism
The IPCC seems to be clueless about running a website, so here’s a direct link to the Stockwell I report (PDF, 1.35MB): link.
Much more later.
-
Recent Comments
-
raw_input
Category Cloud
-
World of Harrowell



More Photos
Categories
Archives
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
- January 2008
- December 2007
- November 2007
- October 2007
- September 2007
- August 2007
- July 2007
- June 2007
- May 2007
- April 2007
- March 2007
- February 2007
- January 2007
- December 2006
- November 2006
- October 2006
- September 2006
- August 2006
- July 2006
- June 2006
- May 2006
- April 2006
- March 2006
- February 2006
- January 2006
- December 2005
- November 2005
- October 2005
- September 2005
- August 2005
- July 2005
- June 2005
- May 2005
- April 2005
- March 2005
- February 2005
- January 2005
- December 2004
- November 2004
- October 2004
- September 2004
- August 2004
- July 2004
- June 2004
- May 2004
- April 2004
- March 2004
- February 2004
- January 2004
- December 2003
- November 2003
- October 2003
- September 2003
- August 2003
- July 2003
- June 2003
BORISFEED- [Medium] A202 Camberwell New Road Kennington, westbound between John Ruskin Street and Foxley Road
- Overseas property investors move in to Scottish buy to let market - Residential Landlord
- Web in trouble? The hidden cables under a Cornish beach feeding ... - Daily Mail
- Roadworks still causing chaos - Romford Recorder
- Hemsworth school faced with £10000 flood bill after vandal attack - Hemsworth and South Elmsall Express
- Eating out - The South African
November 9, 2007 at 12:20 pm
It’s actually worse than I thought:
“Alteration of the surveillance log
20.111 There is no doubt that the surveillance log has been altered. That would
not have occurred if the investigation had been referred to the IPCC
immediately and in accordance with the practice that had been
established during the previous fifteen months of the existence of the
IPCC. The alteration totally changes the context of the entry from ‘I
believed it was NT’ to ‘and I believed it was not NT’. The significance of
this cannot be over stated. The evidence obtained by the IPCC does not
make it possible to establish with any certainty who was responsible for
the alteration. However, it is possible to infer that a clear motive lay
behind the alteration. The investigation has not found sufficient
evidence against any individual to make it possible to suggest that
criminal proceedings might be appropriate.”
tr: “You covered it up but we can’t nail you for it becuase we can’t prove which of you did it.” Blair must go.
Chris Williams